CFM to Tons Reference Values

Convert airflow to approximate tons of cooling using a common 400 CFM per ton rule of thumb.

Author

Prof. Yuki Nakamura

HVAC editorial contributor

Japanese-American sociologist at UC Berkeley, researching immigration policy impacts on second-generation identity

Reviewed for accuracy by

Prof. Kenji Tanaka

HVAC content reviewer

Japanese materials scientist at Kyoto University, known for breakthroughs in sustainable polymer research

Last updatedFebruary 22, 2026

PublishedFebruary 22, 2026

On this page

  1. All value pages
  2. Reference table
  3. FAQs
  4. Methodology and review
  5. Related conversions

Reference Value Index

This page lists 20 reference values for quick browsing and lookup.

Back to converter page · View HTML sitemap

All Reference Values

Reference Table

CFM to Tons reference values
AirflowApprox TonsNominal BTU/h
200 CFM0.5 ton6,000
400 CFM1 ton12,000
600 CFM1.5 ton18,000
800 CFM2 ton24,000
1,000 CFM2.5 ton30,000
1,200 CFM3 ton36,000
1,400 CFM3.5 ton42,000
1,600 CFM4 ton48,000
1,800 CFM4.5 ton54,000
2,000 CFM5 ton60,000
2,200 CFM5.5 ton66,000
2,400 CFM6 ton72,000
2,600 CFM6.5 ton78,000
2,800 CFM7 ton84,000
3,000 CFM7.5 ton90,000
3,200 CFM8 ton96,000
3,400 CFM8.5 ton102,000
3,600 CFM9 ton108,000
3,800 CFM9.5 ton114,000
4,000 CFM10 ton120,000

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions for CFM to Tons and its reference values.

What does CFM to tons conversion assume?

This calculator uses a common comfort-cooling rule of thumb of roughly 400 CFM per ton.

Is 400 CFM per ton always correct?

No. Actual design CFM per ton can vary with humidity control goals, equipment, and operating conditions.

Can this convert in reverse from tons to CFM?

Yes. Multiply tons by 400 to estimate airflow under this rule.

Should I use this for final duct design?

Use it for quick sizing checks. Final design should use equipment data, static pressure, and full load calculations.

Methodology and Review

Each row on this page links to a value detail page derived from the same conversion data file as the main calculator and reference table. This reduces inconsistencies across page variants.

Editorial metadata and structured data are rendered across the converter page and linked value pages. Review policies are documented in our review process and editorial policy.